Facebook

Ultimately is the story of truth or humanity?

Nearly 70 years ago, director Kurosawa Akira introduced the world of Rashōmon and brought Japanese cinema to a new level. Not only won the Golden Lion at the Venezia Film Festival, La Sinh Mon also won an honorary Oscar (equivalent to the best Foreign Language Film category). With the unique storytelling, La Sinh Mon has the power to influence later films. Although released in 1950 with some restrictions, the audience will easily be attracted to the thriller circuit.

See More :
Beginning with a drop of rain at the abandoned La Sinh Mon Temple, a traveler drops into the rain and hears the strangest murder story from the woodcutter and the monk. The same samurai body, the same raped woman and the infamous bandit Tajōmaru but the case fell into a deadlock when the testimony of three people are different and everyone is reasonable. The tomboy of Tajōmaru says that, due to his delicate samurai wife, he tricked his wife into stealing his wife, after which he had a fight with the samurai as his wife's earnest aspirations and end. he with his sword. However, the wife tells that after being smuggled by the Tajomaru in front of her husband, because too distressed by the scorn of the loved one should have slapped knife in his chest in panic. The situation becomes more confused when the samurai enters the coin and recounts that he himself can not accept the cunning words his wife gave the bandit should have killed himself in memory. Even in the closing minutes, the woodcutter revealed that he had witnessed everything and that the story was not the same as the other three told, but he did not dare to tell. It is not true for the judge and the testimony. The story of truth is always a big question mark for the audience. According to the evolution and psychology of the three characters in the murder, their statements are very reasonable. Therefore, the audience must determine what they like best. Even in the closing minutes, the woodcutter revealed that he had witnessed everything and that the story was not the same as the other three told, but he did not dare to tell. It is not true for the judge and the testimony. The story of truth is always a big question mark for the audience. According to the evolution and psychology of the three characters in the murder, their statements are very reasonable. Therefore, the audience must determine what they like best. Even in the closing minutes, the woodcutter revealed that he had witnessed everything and that the story was not the same as the other three told, but he did not dare to tell. It is not true for the judge and the testimony. The story of truth is always a big question mark for the audience. According to the evolution and psychology of the three characters in the murder, their statements are very reasonable. Therefore, the audience must determine what they like best. According to the evolution and psychology of the three characters in the murder, their statements are very reasonable. Therefore, the audience must determine what they like best. According to the evolution and psychology of the three characters in the murder, their statements are very reasonable. Therefore, the audience must determine what they like best.


It is an excellent idea when the story is still open, the truth is decided by the audience and the film does not determine where the story is correct. Each person can reason in the direction he or she wants from the perspective of the individual. What Akira wants to convey is human nature. He was skillful in installing the monk's presence. In the beginning of the film, the teacher ponders when thinking about human death. The monk said that millions of human deaths due to natural disasters and epidemics were not as good as the stories he witnessed. He was indignant at the situation of people living but not trusting each other.


First of all, the marriage situation of the couple. Through the frame, the audience easily recognize this is a very happy couple walking in the forest filled with joy. However, when things do not go well, the attitude of the two become different. The husband can not help but throw his contemptuous eyes to the softness of his wife and vice versa, the wife to preserve the virtue without hesitation ask the bandit killed his husband in the name of morality. On the side of the bandit, he could say sweet words to his wife but ready to turn around, claiming that she and all the other women, despised the woman he had just harmed and vowed. The point is that in front of the abandoned infant, the visitor has appropriated the kimono - the only thing that goes with the baby is the reason "his parents are happy and neglected" so we are not different what Before these situations, No audience does not have the attitude of discontent, loss of faith in human beings as monks. No need for such a painful situation as natural disasters, just minor incidents that people easily face each other for personal gain. Is not "selfish, you can not live" in this turbulent society? People are willing to lose humanity for personal benefit so?


Another factor that makes viewers look no less is the harshness of male-female contempt in the old Japanese society. Obviously a woman with weak arms soft feet, despite the resistance of any size can not beat the violent bandit. Painful, the husband is not merciful but hurriedly despise the weakness of his wife before he ran out of love. Although virtue is a very important thing, but women become so cheap that they can not resist so easily? If so, the wife's distraction that the husband's death is a good thing. Besides, whether love or desire wife, but when her body has passedTwo men, they turned to face. Whether it is suicide or murder, both the robber and the husband protect the honor of men, which tramples on the personality of women. The plot slows down not only to the speculative characters but also to the quiet moments for the audience to ponder.


Fortunately, the film has a very human ending. If notice, right from the opening, the background music in a dizzy, scary with torrential rain. Throughout the film, the rain did not show signs of failure. In the rain are violent gusts corresponding to non-human situations through the narratives of the characters, although the scene is a sunny day. When the ascetic woodcutter decided to take the baby to raise despite difficult circumstances, the rain ended, the faith of humanity back to the teacher.

Besides the director, there is no denying the great acting of the actors. If the insanity of the bandit Tajōmaru makes the viewers shiver, the look of pain and contempt of the husband is also cold. As the wife, Machiko Kyoko has accomplished a great deal of psychological transformation, when she is shocked, embarrassed by the abuse, when the violent fight and culmination is the expression of a grimace when asking for Tajōmaru killed her husband. . She is perfectly logical to say " Women love men with all their heart. And men must win women with the sword . "Obviously, she did not forget the virtue of herself.


Whether it is under the view of detective or human feelings, La Sinh Monsatisfied the most difficult audience. The plot is so slow, but you are afraid that you will not want to miss any minute and most of all, if you just watch the movie once, you have not appreciated the whole class of meaning. that La Sinh Mon transmission.
Ultimately is the story of truth or humanity? Ultimately is the story of truth or humanity? Reviewed by Unknown on tháng 6 04, 2018 Rating: 5

Không có nhận xét nào:

Được tạo bởi Blogger.